More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico
US soldier who fled to North Korea sentenced to one year in confinement and dishonorable discharge
Ex-Memphis police supervisor says there was 'no need' for officers to beat Tyre Nichols
Mexican president blames US in part for rise in violence in Sinaloa
The head of Boeing's defense and space business is out as company tries to fix troubled contracts
Whooping cough cases are soaring. Can infecting people help test a better vaccine?
SEC approves BlackRock's spot bitcoin ETF options listing
Wojnarowski one of the first significant sports 'insiders' to step away from the spotlight
Lewd posts by Trump-backed candidate for NC governor removed from porn forum
A lost cat's mysterious 2-month, 900-mile journey home to California
The Facebook group "Are We Dating The Same Guy?" has achieved a legal win in California. The group, known for helping women share information about their dating experiences, faced a lawsuit from Stewart Lucas Murrey, who claimed that posts about him in the group caused emotional distress and violated his privacy.
According to Secret Los Angeles, on April 8, a California judge made headlines by dismissing one of several lawsuits aimed at one of these local groups. Court documents mention nine names, though Murrey had targeted over 50 women. The groups in question are part of a vast network of similar private Facebook groups.
Murrey's website outlines his accusations, claiming that the lawsuits are against "defendants, particularly key players who obsessively conspired to stalk, dox, and harass me." He argues that the actions within these groups represent "illegal violations of privacy" that have become pervasive. These statements reflect his belief that such activities are not just isolated incidents but part of a broader, harmful trend.
One of the defendants, Vanessa Valdes, successfully filed an anti-SLAPP motion, which was granted by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Gregory Keosian. These motions help quickly dismiss lawsuits that are seen as trying to limit free speech. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press explains that anti-SLAPP laws protect people from meritless lawsuits aimed at stopping them from exercising their rights.
Despite this dismissal, other defendants still face ongoing lawsuits from Murrey. This case is among several similar lawsuits happening across the country. In Chicago, another lawsuit was filed against 27 women for their posts in their local chapter of the group. Although initially dismissed in January, the plaintiff refiled the complaint the next day.
The plaintiffs in these lawsuits argue that the verdicts have broader implications for privacy and online forums. These rulings could affect how people share information and their rights to free speech on social media platforms. The outcomes may shape future legal boundaries around privacy issues and online behavior.
