Wife accused of shooting, killing husband in Tracy
Deputies: Man molested children during sleepovers at his Marion County house, offered to buy them
Toddler rescued from hot car in Chickasaw; Father charged
What to know about the growing conflict between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah
North Carolina judge rejects Republican challenge to student voter IDs
UN rights expert urges urgent action as Haiti crisis worsens
Investor focus turns to data, election, earnings after Fed cut
Boeing furloughs begin on Friday for thousands in Pacific Northwest
Cardinal Health to acquire Integrated Oncology Network for $1.12 billion
Kelce Cereal: Travis Kelce and Jason Kelce's cereal hits the shelves in Kansas City
Why does 'The Babadook' still haunt? Its director, Jennifer Kent, has some answers
SEC rules Fox can skip vote on labeling TV opinion shows
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A civil trial in Texas over a so-called “Trump Train” that surrounded a Biden-Harris campaign bus days before the 2020 election reached closing arguments Friday before a federal jury decides whether the rolling highway encounter amounted to political intimidation.
"This case is not about politics,” Robert Meyer, an attorney representing those aboard the bus, told the jury. “It’s about safety.”
The two-week trial in an Austin federal courthouse has included testimony from former Texas Democratic lawmaker Wendy Davis, who ran for governor in 2014, and is one of three people who was on board the bus and brought the lawsuit against six supporters of former President Donald Trump.
No criminal charges have been filed against the Trump supporters, who have argued that their actions during the convoy on Oct. 30, 2020, were protected speech.
Video that Davis recorded from the bus shows pickup trucks with large Trump flags slowing down to box in the bus as it tried to move away from the group of Trump supporters. One of the defendants hit a campaign volunteer’s car while the trucks occupied all lanes of traffic, forcing the bus and everyone around it to a 15 mph crawl.
During closing arguments Friday, Meyer argued that the defendants’ conversations leading up to the convoy about “Operation Block the Bus,” dissemination of flyers and aggressive driving met the criteria for political intimidation.
“This wasn’t some kind of peaceful protest,” Meyer said. “The bus swarmed on all sides.”
Attorneys for the defendants were set to make their closing arguments before the seven-member jury later Friday.
Those on the bus — including Davis, a campaign staffer and the driver — repeatedly called 911 asking for help and a police escort through San Marcos, but when no law enforcement arrived, the campaign canceled the event and pushed forward to Austin.
The trial began with plaintiffs' attorneys saying that organizers targeted the bus in a calculated attack to intimidate the Democrats, arguing that it violated the “Ku Klux Klan Act,” an 1871 federal law that bans political violence and intimidation.
The City of San Marcos settled a separate lawsuit filed by the same three Democrats against the police, agreeing to pay $175,000 and mandate political violence training for law enforcement.
___
Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
