China home sales rise after stimulus measures, state media says
Wynn Resorts says it gets UAE's first gambling license
A Texas execution is renewing calls for clemency. It's rarely granted
Rescue teams search for missing after floods, landslides kill at least 16 in Bosnia
Militants kill six Pakistani soldiers during a shootout in the country's northwest
Ukraine's Zelenskiy to present 'victory plan' at Ramstein meeting
UK's Reeves promises 'guardrails' around extra borrowing in budget
US dividend ETFs bask in investor attention after jumbo Fed rate cut
Stanford scientists develop gel to protect homes against wildfires
Soccer-Bosnian FA postpones all matches amid floods and landslides
Dillon Gabriel, Jordan James lead No. 6 Oregon to 31-10 victory over Michigan State
Syracuse rallies to force overtime and beat No. 25 UNLV 44-41, spoiling Rebels' poll debut
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has four cases still undecided. In particular, the justices are still weighing whether former President Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution in the election interference case against him, roughly two months after hearing arguments. Though the justices typically issue all of their rulings by the end of June, this term they are expected to continue into early July.
The court heard 61 cases this term.
Here's a look at three of the major undecided cases:
Donald Trump is arguing that former presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts they took in office and that the indictment he faces on charges of election interference must be dismissed.
The Supreme Court has previously ruled that former presidents can’t be sued in civil cases for what they did in office, but it has never weighed in on criminal immunity.
The timing of the decision may be as important as the outcome. Trump’s trial in Washington, D.C., may not take place before the November election, even if the court rules he is not immune.
Two cases involve social media laws in Texas and Florida that would limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content posted by their users. While the details vary, both laws aimed to address conservative complaints that the social media companies were liberal-leaning and censored users based on their viewpoints, especially on the political right.
___
Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
