Biden promised to turn the page on Trump. Now he's being replaced by him
Firefighters prepare for increasing gusts following brief reprieve for LA area
John Ratcliffe, tapped by Trump to lead the CIA, will face questioning in the Senate
Nippon Steel wants to work with Trump administration on US Steel deal, Mori tells WSJ
After cable damage, Taiwan to step up surveillance of flag of convenience ships
BOJ will raise rates if economy, price conditions continue to improve, Ueda says
Manatees congregate in warm waters near power plants as US winter storms graze Florida
AAPI adults prioritize immigration, but split on mass deportations: AP-NORC/AAPI Data poll
As Los Angeles burns, Hollywood's Oscar season turns into a pledge drive
As fires ravage Los Angeles, Tiger Woods isn't sure what will happen with Riviera tournament
Antetokounmpo gets 50th career triple-double as Bucks win 130-115 to end Kings' 7-game win streak
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's approval of its first new deep coal mine in decades was unlawful because ministers failed to consider the "adverse international signal" sent by the controversial decision, environmental campaigners told London's High Court on Tuesday.
Friends of the Earth and South Lakeland Action on Climate Change are challenging the previous Conservative government's 2022 approval of the coking coal mine in northwest England.
Lawyers representing SLACC said in court filings that ministers did not consider the impact on Britain's status as a climate leader and the potential effect of "encouraging other countries to permit new fossil fuel developments".
Britain dropped its defence of the legal challenges after a Supreme Court ruling which said planning authorities must consider the impact of burning, not just extracting, fossil fuels when deciding whether to approve projects.
But developer West Cumbria Mining is still fighting the case and says the project – which plans to extract coking coal for manufacturing steel, rather than to generate electricity – would be "a unique 'net zero' mine".
West Cumbria Mining's lawyer James Strachan said in court filings that the development would not cause a net increase in greenhouse gas emissions, as the use of coking coal extracted from the mine is driven by demand for steel.
Strachan also argued that the approval of the mine would be positive for Britain's global standing, as it would meet a need for coking coal extracted from within the country.
Lawyers representing the campaign groups, however, argued the international impact of approving the mine was central to the planning dispute and had been overlooked by ministers.
Friends of the Earth's lawyer Paul Brown said in court filings that the issue "was not what kind of climate virtue signalling the UK should engage in", but whether approving the mine would diminish Britain's ability to influence international negotiations.
The hearing is due to finish on Thursday, with a ruling expected at a later date. (This story has been refiled to correct the spelling of 'coking' paragraph 6)
(Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Ros Russell)
