AI harm is often behind the scenes and builds over time – a legal scholar explains how the law can adapt to respond
Lawsuit against UK security agency by survivors of Ariana Grande concert bombing is rejected
Beyond evangelicals, Trump and his allies courted smaller faith groups, from the Amish to Chabad
Mexico's economy up 1.1% in the third quarter
Little hope in Gaza that arrest warrants will cool Israeli onslaught
Swiss National Bank chief stresses tackling inflation as main goal
Awkwardness can hit in any social situation – here are a philosopher’s 5 strategies to navigate it with grace
Here's Jason: Kelce will host late-night show on ESPN beginning final week of NFL season
Rare first edition of Machiavelli’s famous leadership treatise, ‘The Prince,’ goes up for auction
MOBILE, AL - FEBRUARY 01: A general view of a USC Trojans helmet during the National team practice for the Reese's Senior Bowl on February 1, 2024 at Hancock Whitney Stadium in Mobile, Alabama. (Photo by Michael Wade/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)The NCAA unveiled a judgment Tuesday against the University of Southern California’s football program, which includes a fine of $50,000 and one year of probation. The Trojans’ coaching staff were accused of exceeding the number of coaches permitted by the league for more than a full academic year.
Other sanctions against USC include restrictions on the access its analysts will have to access team practices and review tapes, and a reduction in the number of hours football staff will dedicate to athletic activities. The latter condition was self-imposed by the school.
According to the NCAA’s statement, the violation in question occurred between spring semester of 2022 and spring semester of 2023, when eight of the team’s analysts engaged in activities which fell under the definition of “coaching.”
The resolution negotiated between the NCAA and USC football identifies the offending activities. One analyst is alleged to have improperly met with student athletes in order to give them feedback. Additionally, several analysts gave students feedback during on-field practices at various times.
As a result, the NCAA found the team to be employing sixteen assistant coaches, six more than is allowed by league rules.
While USC football Head Coach Lincoln Riley was subject to the judgment as head of the team’s coaching staff, the NCAA declined to suspend him.
“Head coaches are presumed responsible for the actions of their staff, and as a result, Riley violated head coach responsibility rules,” the league said in its statement. “In this case, however, some of the violations occurred before rules changes effective in January 2023 that shifted head coach responsibility rules from a rebuttable presumption to automatic attachment.”
USC Football released a statement asserting that the team has “identified and acknowledged violations, issued corrective measures, and submitted a negotiated resolution in a timely fashion that was approved by the Committee. We remain committed to upholding the highest standards of ethical behavior and integrity in our athletic programs.”
The NCAA, acknowledged the swift actions taken by the team as a significant factor in its decision not to suspend Riley.
"Because Riley was not personally involved in the violations and demonstrated that he promoted an atmosphere of compliance and monitored his staff, Riley rebutted his presumed responsibility for the violations occurring before the rules change," the statement reads. "For the same reasons, the parties also agreed that a suspension penalty for Riley was not appropriate."
On Tuesday, Riley told reporters he took the charges seriously, but hoped to move past them. “We don't take it lightly, we own the things that we have to correct and we move forward,” he said.
