S&P Global lifts annual profit forecast on demand for analytics products
IMF chief warns that world risks falling into slow-growth rut and urges China to enact reforms
White House presses gov't AI use with eye on security, guardrails
Bank of England's Mann says fall in inflation pressure has long way to go
Italy's 5-Star leader dumps party founder, comedian Grillo
Brazil inflation picks up in mid-October with higher electricity costs
US weekly jobless claims unexpectedly fall
Four detained in Spain over hate campaign against Real Madrid's Vinicius
Atlanta's No. 1 pick Risacher hits 1st NBA shot, vows to get 'better and better and better'
Georgia's Gullah-Geechee community seeks path forward after deadly dock collapse
Amendment 80 would give children the 'right' to choose from neighborhood, charter, private and home schools, as well as 'future innovations in education.'
Who supports Amendment 80
Amendment 80 reflects a familiar political divide when it comes to school choice policies.
Republicans largely support more parental prerogatives to choose schools, including private schools, and fewer restrictions on those schools.
Democrats tend to oppose unregulated choice and programs that fund private schools, and support accountability measures for schools that receive public funds.
There are, of course, exceptions to this partisan divide.
Some Democrats, including Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, who founded two charter schools, have objected to efforts to regulate charters.
Meanwhile, some conservatives, including Christian homeschoolers, have expressed concerns about government involvement in private schooling, which they fear could lead to regulation.
The proposal frames school choice as a child’s right, leading some to worry it will give a student’s wishes legal predominance over their parents’.
Those skeptics may have a point. Rather than push directly for school vouchers, backers of Amendment 80 simply make the seemingly innocuous assertion that school choice is a “right.”
School choice as a ‘right’
The fact that advocates for this measure are framing the issue this way – rather than as an effective taxpayer-funded policy, for example – is telling.
While there are different forms of school choice, like charter and magnet schools, the modern private school choice movement emerged as a way for Southern segregationists to avoid integration.
The movement gained momentum in the 1990s by asserting that choice leads to better educational outcomes, and that it gives low-income students an equitable opportunity to attend better schools.
Those claims have not stood up.
Every rigorous study of statewide voucher programs in the past 10 years has shown that they do not improve student outcomes. In fact, they have led to some of the largest learning losses ever measured — comparable to the losses from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Rather than simply giving low-income students opportunities beyond their segregated schools, charter schools lead to higher levels of segregation.
Additionally, statewide private school choice programs, such as what one might envision arising from Amendment 80, are budget-busters for state treasuries and for rural schools as they channel public funds away from high-need areas to affluent families using these programs.
In light of that track record, it is not surprising to see choice advocates move away from their earlier equity claims and focus instead on “rights” — even when such a right can lead to worse educational outcomes for kids.
But even if the rhetorical strategy around Amendment 80 is clear, the question still stands: Why push to enshrine rights that are already effectively available through both Colorado law and U.S. Supreme Court rulings?
Public funds for private schools
Michael Fields, the president of Advance Colorado, the organization that promoted the proposal, noted that the idea is to “preserve” and “protect families’ ability to choose the best educational options for themselves.”
Elsewhere, he said, “It’s really just cementing the school choice laws that we have in Colorado right now into the constitution.”
Essentially he is arguing that Amendment 80 would confirm the status quo in Colorado.
But the actual language of the initiative tells a different story.
Rather than simply affirming an existing right to choose a public, charter or homeschool, the more important issue here is the right to choose a private school.
Of course, this right already exists. Since at least 1925, parents across the U.S. have been guaranteed the right to choose private schools for their children, but at their own expense.
If Amendment 80 passes, I expect we will see the argument that such a right is meaningless without funding to support the choice of private schools. After all, when people talk about the right to public education or health care, the underlying assumption is that there is no cost barrier to exercising that right, which is funded by taxpayers.
Recent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court suggest Colorado’s prohibition on the use of public funds for “church or sectarian” schools could be challenged in court. Adding a right to private school choice to the state’s constitution through Amendment 80 appears to be designed to provide the basis for such a challenge.
Early voting is happening now in Colorado. Find your polling place here.
Christopher Lubienski does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Source: The Conversation
